DA

dagger-design-proposals

Standardizes the writing process for Dagger design proposals and technical RFCs.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2241" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Write design proposals for Dagger features. Use when asked to draft, review, or iterate on Dagger design documents, RFCs, or proposals.
135 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Draft Dagger feature proposals
  • Review design RFCs
  • Format technical architecture proposals
  • Define GraphQL schema structures

How it works

The skill guides the creation of design documents by enforcing a specific structure including problem statements, GraphQL definitions, and CLI examples based on existing Dagger patterns.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Feature concept or technical requirement
You get back
Structured Dagger design proposal

When to use dagger-design-proposals

  • Write a new Dagger feature proposal
  • Review a design RFC
  • Format technical architecture proposals

About this skill

Dagger Design Proposals

Guidelines for writing design proposals for Dagger features.

Before Writing

Always research first:

  1. Check relevant internal docs, such as internal-docs/dagger-codegen.md, for context
  2. Look at related code in the Dagger codebase:
    • GraphQL schema: core/schema/*.go
    • CLI commands: cmd/dagger/*.go
    • Core types: core/*.go
  3. For public API or workspace proposals, read internal-docs/version-gating.md
  4. Understand existing patterns before proposing new ones

Structure

# Part N: Title

*Builds on [Part N-1: Title](link)*

## Table of Contents
- [Problem](#problem)
- [Solution](#solution)
- [Core Concept](#core-concept)
- [CLI](#cli)
- [Status](#status)

## Problem

Numbered, concise limitations:

1. **Short title** - One sentence explanation.
2. **Short title** - One sentence explanation.

## Solution

One paragraph summary.

## Core Concept

GraphQL type definitions with inline docstrings:

```graphql
"""
Type description here.
"""
type Example {
  """Method description."""
  method(arg: String!): Result!
}
```

Go for implementation examples:

```go
func New(ws dagger.Workspace) *Example {
    // ...
}
```

## CLI

Real command examples:

```bash
$ dagger command --flag
OUTPUT
```

## Status

One line.

---

- Previous: [Part N-1](link)
- Next: [Part N+1](link) or "Part N+1: Title (coming soon)"

Style

  • Concise - Trust the reader. Remove fluff.
  • Tables - Use for comparisons.
  • GraphQL for APIs - Type definitions, not Go interfaces.
  • Go for implementation - Examples showing how modules use the API.
  • Real examples - go-toolchain, node-toolchain, not abstract Foo/Bar.
  • Less is more - Remove sections when challenged.

What to Avoid

  • Separate "Methods" sections (use GraphQL docstrings)
  • "Design Rationale" sections unless specifically valuable
  • "Open Questions" that aren't real blockers
  • Go for type definitions (use GraphQL)
  • Layout examples that might confuse
  • Over-explaining

Process

  1. Gists as source of truth - Publish early, iterate in gist
  2. Link parts together - Previous/Next at bottom, "Builds on" at top
  3. Each part stands alone - But builds on previous
  4. Iterate quickly - User feedback drives changes

Iterating with User

When you have clarifying questions or notes:

  1. List them first - Present a high-level numbered list of all questions/notes
  2. One at a time - Walk through each item individually, waiting for user response
  3. Don't dump - Never present all questions with full details at once

Codebase References

When writing proposals, reference actual Dagger code:

TopicLocation
GraphQL schema definitionscore/schema/*.go
CLI commandscmd/dagger/*.go
Core types (Directory, File, etc.)core/*.go
Engine internalsengine/*.go
SDK codegeninternal-docs/dagger-codegen.md, cmd/codegen/*.go
API version gatesinternal-docs/version-gating.md, core/schema/*.go

Example: To understand how Host.findUp works before proposing Workspace.findUp:

# Find the schema definition
grep -r "findUp" core/schema/host.go

# Find the implementation
grep -r "FindUp" core/host.go

Publishing

# Create new gist
gh gist create file.md --desc "Dagger Design: Part N - Title" --public

# Update existing gist
gh gist edit GIST_ID file.md

# Post changelog comment (always do this after updates)
gh api --method POST /gists/GIST_ID/comments -f body="## Changelog
- Change 1
- Change 2"

Always post a changelog comment after updating a gist with significant changes.

Related Skills

Check for other Dagger skills that may help with research:

  • engine-debugging - Engine debugging workflows, trace replay, cache snapshots
  • internal-docs/dagger-codegen.md - SDK codegen, templates, bindings
  • internal-docs/version-gating.md - schema views and public API version gates
  • internal-docs/ - Cache and engine implementation references

When not to use it

  • Writing abstract Foo/Bar examples
  • Over-explaining design rationale

Limitations

  • Requires research in internal Dagger docs before drafting
  • Proposals must be published as gists

How it compares

It enforces a standardized proposal format and requires referencing actual Dagger codebase patterns, ensuring consistency across feature designs.

Compared to similar skills

dagger-design-proposals side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
dagger-design-proposals (this skill)63moReviewIntermediate
architecture-decision-records545moReviewBeginner
wiki-architect113moNo flagsAdvanced
smart-docs49moReviewIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

architecture-decision-records

wshobson

Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.

54217

wiki-architect

microsoft

Analyzes code repositories and generates hierarchical documentation structures with onboarding guides. Use when the user wants to create a wiki, generate documentation, map a codebase structure, or understand a project's architecture at a high level.

1144

smart-docs

sopaco

AI-powered comprehensive codebase documentation generator. Analyzes project structure, identifies architecture patterns, creates C4 model diagrams, and generates professional technical documentation. Use when users need to document codebases, understand software architecture, create technical specs, or generate developer guides. Supports all programming languages. Alternative to Litho/deepwiki-rs that uses Claude Code subscription without external API costs.

422

codebase-documenter

mhattingpete

Generates comprehensive documentation explaining how a codebase works, including architecture, key components, data flow, and development guidelines. Use when user wants to understand unfamiliar code, create onboarding docs, document architecture, or explain how the system works.

613

c4-architecture-c4-architecture

sickn33

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

117

design-documentation

jasonkneen

Transform approved requirements into comprehensive technical designs. Define system architecture, component interactions, data models, and interfaces to create a blueprint for implementation.

16

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry