Standardizes the writing process for Dagger design proposals and technical RFCs.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2241" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/dagger-design-proposals
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Write design proposals for Dagger features. Use when asked to draft, review, or iterate on Dagger design documents, RFCs, or proposals.Key capabilities
- →Draft Dagger feature proposals
- →Review design RFCs
- →Format technical architecture proposals
- →Define GraphQL schema structures
How it works
The skill guides the creation of design documents by enforcing a specific structure including problem statements, GraphQL definitions, and CLI examples based on existing Dagger patterns.
Inputs & outputs
When to use dagger-design-proposals
- →Write a new Dagger feature proposal
- →Review a design RFC
- →Format technical architecture proposals
About this skill
Dagger Design Proposals
Guidelines for writing design proposals for Dagger features.
Before Writing
Always research first:
- Check relevant internal docs, such as
internal-docs/dagger-codegen.md, for context - Look at related code in the Dagger codebase:
- GraphQL schema:
core/schema/*.go - CLI commands:
cmd/dagger/*.go - Core types:
core/*.go
- GraphQL schema:
- For public API or workspace proposals, read
internal-docs/version-gating.md - Understand existing patterns before proposing new ones
Structure
# Part N: Title
*Builds on [Part N-1: Title](link)*
## Table of Contents
- [Problem](#problem)
- [Solution](#solution)
- [Core Concept](#core-concept)
- [CLI](#cli)
- [Status](#status)
## Problem
Numbered, concise limitations:
1. **Short title** - One sentence explanation.
2. **Short title** - One sentence explanation.
## Solution
One paragraph summary.
## Core Concept
GraphQL type definitions with inline docstrings:
```graphql
"""
Type description here.
"""
type Example {
"""Method description."""
method(arg: String!): Result!
}
```
Go for implementation examples:
```go
func New(ws dagger.Workspace) *Example {
// ...
}
```
## CLI
Real command examples:
```bash
$ dagger command --flag
OUTPUT
```
## Status
One line.
---
- Previous: [Part N-1](link)
- Next: [Part N+1](link) or "Part N+1: Title (coming soon)"
Style
- Concise - Trust the reader. Remove fluff.
- Tables - Use for comparisons.
- GraphQL for APIs - Type definitions, not Go interfaces.
- Go for implementation - Examples showing how modules use the API.
- Real examples - go-toolchain, node-toolchain, not abstract Foo/Bar.
- Less is more - Remove sections when challenged.
What to Avoid
- Separate "Methods" sections (use GraphQL docstrings)
- "Design Rationale" sections unless specifically valuable
- "Open Questions" that aren't real blockers
- Go for type definitions (use GraphQL)
- Layout examples that might confuse
- Over-explaining
Process
- Gists as source of truth - Publish early, iterate in gist
- Link parts together - Previous/Next at bottom, "Builds on" at top
- Each part stands alone - But builds on previous
- Iterate quickly - User feedback drives changes
Iterating with User
When you have clarifying questions or notes:
- List them first - Present a high-level numbered list of all questions/notes
- One at a time - Walk through each item individually, waiting for user response
- Don't dump - Never present all questions with full details at once
Codebase References
When writing proposals, reference actual Dagger code:
| Topic | Location |
|---|---|
| GraphQL schema definitions | core/schema/*.go |
| CLI commands | cmd/dagger/*.go |
| Core types (Directory, File, etc.) | core/*.go |
| Engine internals | engine/*.go |
| SDK codegen | internal-docs/dagger-codegen.md, cmd/codegen/*.go |
| API version gates | internal-docs/version-gating.md, core/schema/*.go |
Example: To understand how Host.findUp works before proposing Workspace.findUp:
# Find the schema definition
grep -r "findUp" core/schema/host.go
# Find the implementation
grep -r "FindUp" core/host.go
Publishing
# Create new gist
gh gist create file.md --desc "Dagger Design: Part N - Title" --public
# Update existing gist
gh gist edit GIST_ID file.md
# Post changelog comment (always do this after updates)
gh api --method POST /gists/GIST_ID/comments -f body="## Changelog
- Change 1
- Change 2"
Always post a changelog comment after updating a gist with significant changes.
Related Skills
Check for other Dagger skills that may help with research:
engine-debugging- Engine debugging workflows, trace replay, cache snapshotsinternal-docs/dagger-codegen.md- SDK codegen, templates, bindingsinternal-docs/version-gating.md- schema views and public API version gatesinternal-docs/- Cache and engine implementation references
When not to use it
- →Writing abstract Foo/Bar examples
- →Over-explaining design rationale
Limitations
- →Requires research in internal Dagger docs before drafting
- →Proposals must be published as gists
How it compares
It enforces a standardized proposal format and requires referencing actual Dagger codebase patterns, ensuring consistency across feature designs.
Compared to similar skills
dagger-design-proposals side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dagger-design-proposals (this skill) | 6 | 3mo | Review | Intermediate |
| architecture-decision-records | 54 | 5mo | Review | Beginner |
| wiki-architect | 11 | 3mo | No flags | Advanced |
| smart-docs | 4 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
architecture-decision-records
wshobson
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
wiki-architect
microsoft
Analyzes code repositories and generates hierarchical documentation structures with onboarding guides. Use when the user wants to create a wiki, generate documentation, map a codebase structure, or understand a project's architecture at a high level.
smart-docs
sopaco
AI-powered comprehensive codebase documentation generator. Analyzes project structure, identifies architecture patterns, creates C4 model diagrams, and generates professional technical documentation. Use when users need to document codebases, understand software architecture, create technical specs, or generate developer guides. Supports all programming languages. Alternative to Litho/deepwiki-rs that uses Claude Code subscription without external API costs.
codebase-documenter
mhattingpete
Generates comprehensive documentation explaining how a codebase works, including architecture, key components, data flow, and development guidelines. Use when user wants to understand unfamiliar code, create onboarding docs, document architecture, or explain how the system works.
c4-architecture-c4-architecture
sickn33
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.
design-documentation
jasonkneen
Transform approved requirements into comprehensive technical designs. Define system architecture, component interactions, data models, and interfaces to create a blueprint for implementation.