creating-stakeholder-packet

Creating the Stakeholder Input Packet

Overview

The packet (template: templates/stakeholder-input-packet.md, sections §1–§17) is the sole source of business truth for the entire agent pipeline. Core principle: nothing enters the packet that the stakeholder did not say or explicitly confirm. This skill extracts the packet through an interview. It never authors business truth — a drafted rule the stakeholder never confirmed is corrupted input that every downstream agent will faithfully build on.

When to Use

• New project: the idea exists only in someone's head, chat messages, or a short brief.
• An existing packet draft has OPEN items, hedges ("maybe", "I think"), or contradictions to resolve.

Do NOT use for:

• A complete, confirmed packet → invoke the delivery-orchestrator agent directly.
• A mid-run scope change → write a packet amendment per the Agent Handoff Protocol §3.3. Never edit the frozen copy under runs/<run-id>/00-packet/, never restart the interview.

The Interview Loop

digraph interview_loop {
    "Intake: map input to §1–§17" [shape=box];
    "Any section EMPTY/PARTIAL, hedge, or contradiction?" [shape=diamond];
    "Interview round (≤4 questions)" [shape=box];
    "Read back §5, §8, §13, §15 for confirmation" [shape=box];
    "Completeness gate passes?" [shape=diamond];
    "Save packet, hand off to pipeline" [shape=box];

    "Intake: map input to §1–§17" -> "Any section EMPTY/PARTIAL, hedge, or contradiction?";
    "Any section EMPTY/PARTIAL, hedge, or contradiction?" -> "Interview round (≤4 questions)" [label="yes"];
    "Interview round (≤4 questions)" -> "Any section EMPTY/PARTIAL, hedge, or contradiction?" [label="update map"];
    "Any section EMPTY/PARTIAL, hedge, or contradiction?" -> "Read back §5, §8, §13, §15 for confirmation" [label="no"];
    "Read back §5, §8, §13, §15 for confirmation" -> "Completeness gate passes?";
    "Completeness gate passes?" -> "Save packet, hand off to pipeline" [label="yes"];
    "Completeness gate passes?" -> "Interview round (≤4 questions)" [label="no — gaps remain"];
}

Phase 1 — Intake & Mapping

1. Read the template templates/stakeholder-input-packet.md in full first — its prompts AND its worked example set the expected level of detail.
2. Collect whatever input exists. Quote-map every stakeholder statement to a section §1–§17.
3. Mark each section: FILLED = its template prompt could be answered without further asking; PARTIAL = statements map to it but fall short of the template's detail; EMPTY = nothing maps. List every hedge and contradiction separately — each must be resolved by a question, never hardened into a fact.
4. Persist the map, the hedge/contradiction lists, and the pending question queue to packet-interview-state.md next to the intended packet destination. This file is working state, never the packet; resume an interrupted interview from it. An unconfirmed packet is never saved as the packet — if the stakeholder becomes unavailable, the work stays in this file.

Phase 2 — Interview Rounds

• ≤4 questions per round. Plain language only — the stakeholder is non-technical; no schema/auth/API vocabulary.
• Use AskUserQuestion when available (concrete options + free-text always possible); otherwise numbered questions in chat.
• Priority order: §1–§5 (identity, roles, journeys, features, rules) → §6–§9 (data, touchpoints, permissions, privacy) → §10–§15 → §16–§17.
• One topic per question. Show the expected detail level by borrowing from the template's worked example.
• "I don't know" is a valid answer → mark OPEN with enough context for the Requirements Analyst to form a clarification question. OPEN is permitted only after the stakeholder was actually asked.
• Convert every relative date to an absolute date (today + offset). Collect domain words for §17 as they appear.
• Money, identity, and irreversibility hide the biggest gaps: if anything is charged, paid, refunded, deleted, or restricted, drill until the rule is a single testable sentence (amount, boundary moment, who can override).

Per-section question bank and gap probes: see interview-guide.md in this directory.

Phase 3 — Draft & Read-Back

Draft each section in the stakeholder's own words. Then read back verbatim for explicit confirmation the four normative sections:

A "yes, that's right" from the stakeholder is required per section. Unconfirmed drafts of these sections may not ship in the packet.

When you reword a vague answer into a testable sentence (common for §5 rules and §13 examples), the reworded sentence you read back and the stakeholder confirms becomes their wording. §17 glossary definitions are confirmed the same way.

Phase 4 — Completeness Gate

All must hold before saving:

• All 17 sections present; each FILLED or carrying explicit OPEN items.
• §2: every role has who / approximate count / needs. §8 covers every §2 role with can / can-never.
• §3: 3–7 journeys, each with at least one thing-goes-wrong path.
• §4: every feature tagged MUST / SHOULD / LATER. No effort or time estimates anywhere in the packet (an absolute deadline date in §14 is a constraint, not an estimate).
• §5: each rule is one testable plain sentence.
• §13: 5–10 concrete, checkable statements.
• §16: a named human decision-maker with response expectations.
• No unconfirmed hedges, no relative dates, every contradiction resolved or OPEN.
• Spot-check against the template's traceability appendix: each section's consuming agents could act on what is written.

Phase 5 — Save & Hand Off

1. Confirm the file destination with the operator running the session. Default: runs/<yyyy-mm>-<project-slug>/00-packet/stakeholder-input-packet.md (the frozen copy per the Agent Handoff Protocol §1). Content confirmations always come from the stakeholder; file-location and process confirmations come from the operator — these may be different people.
2. Delete or archive packet-interview-state.md once the packet is saved.
3. Recommend the next step: invoke the delivery-orchestrator agent for a full run, or the requirements-analyst agent directly for a packet dry-run before committing to a run.

Common Mistakes

Red Flags — Stop and Return to the Loop

• You are writing a §5 rule or §8 permission the stakeholder never stated.
• You are about to save with a section you never asked about.
• A question round contains technical vocabulary.
• "The example packet had X, so this project probably needs X too" — the worked example calibrates detail, it does not supply content.