cookbook-audit
Checks notebook quality against standard rubrics and style guides.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/cookbook-audit && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/432" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/cookbook-audit && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/cookbook-audit
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Audit an Anthropic Cookbook notebook based on a rubric. Use whenever a notebook review or audit is requested.Key capabilities
- →Validates notebook instructional structure against style guides
- →Scans for hardcoded API keys and credentials
- →Generates scoring reports based on problem-focused learning objectives
- →Creates markdown versions of notebooks for reviewer readability
- →Checks for consistency with canonical cookbook templates
How it works
Runs automated validation scripts to scan for security credentials and checks document content against a pre-defined rubric.
Inputs & outputs
When to use cookbook-audit
- →Verifying cookbook instructional quality
- →Running security scans on notebooks
- →Reviewing technical documentation consistency
About this skill
Cookbook Audit
Instructions
Review the requested Cookbook notebook using the guidelines and rubrics in style_guide.md. Provide a score based on scoring guidelines and recommendations on improving the cookbook.
The style guide provides detailed templates and examples for:
- Problem-focused introductions with Terminal Learning Objectives (TLOs) and Enabling Learning Objectives (ELOs)
- Prerequisites and setup patterns
- Core content structure
- Conclusions that map back to learning objectives
IMPORTANT: Always read style_guide.md first before conducting an audit. The style guide contains the canonical templates and good/bad examples to reference.
Workflow
Follow these steps for a comprehensive audit:
- Read the style guide: First review
style_guide.mdto understand current best practices - Identify the notebook: Ask user for path if not provided
- Run automated checks: Use
python3 validate_notebook.py <path>to catch technical issues and generate markdown- The script automatically runs detect-secrets to scan for hardcoded API keys and credentials
- Uses custom patterns defined in
scripts/detect-secrets/plugins.py - Checks against baseline at
scripts/detect-secrets/.secrets.baseline
- Review markdown output: The script generates a markdown file in the
tmp/folder for easier review (saves context vs raw .ipynb)- The tmp/ folder is gitignored to avoid committing review artifacts
- Markdown includes code cells but excludes outputs for cleaner review
- Manual review: Read through the markdown version evaluating against style guide and rubric
- Score each dimension: Apply scoring guidelines objectively
- Generate report: Follow the audit report format below
- Provide specific examples: Show concrete improvements with line references using the style guide templates
Audit Report Format
Present your audit using this structure:
Executive Summary
- Overall Score: X/20
- Key Strengths (2-3 bullet points)
- Critical Issues (2-3 bullet points)
Detailed Scoring
1. Narrative Quality: X/5
[Brief justification with specific examples]
2. Code Quality: X/5
[Brief justification with specific examples]
3. Technical Accuracy: X/5
[Brief justification with specific examples]
4. Actionability & Understanding: X/5
[Brief justification with specific examples]
Specific Recommendations
[Prioritized, actionable list of improvements with references to specific sections]
Examples & Suggestions
[Show specific excerpts from the notebook with concrete suggestions for improvement]
Quick Reference Checklist
Use this to ensure comprehensive coverage:
Introduction (See style_guide.md Section 1)
- Hooks with the problem being solved (1-2 sentences)
- Explains why it matters (1-2 sentences)
- Lists learning objectives as bullet points (2-4 TLOs/ELOs)
- Focuses on value delivered, not machinery built
- Optional: mentions broader applications (1 sentence)
Prerequisites & Setup (See style_guide.md Section 2)
- Lists required knowledge clearly
- Lists required tools (Python version, API keys)
- Mentions recommended background if applicable
- Uses %%capture for pip install to suppress output
- Uses dotenv.load_dotenv() not os.environ
- Defines MODEL constant at top
- Groups related installs in single command
Structure & Organization
- Has logical section progression
- Each section teaches through demonstration
- Code blocks have explanatory text before them
- Includes what we learned after code blocks
- Uses headers to break up sections
Conclusion (See style_guide.md Section 4)
- Maps back to learning objectives
- Summarizes what was accomplished
- Suggests ways to apply lessons to user's context
- Points to next steps or related resources
Code Quality
- All code blocks have explanatory text before them
- No hardcoded API keys (automatically checked by detect-secrets)
- Meaningful variable names
- Comments explain "why" not "what"
- Follows language best practices
- Model name defined as constant at top of notebook
Output Management
- pip install logs suppressed with %%capture
- No verbose debug output
- Shows relevant API responses
- Stack traces only when demonstrating error handling
Content Quality
- Explains why approaches work
- Discusses when to use this approach
- Mentions limitations/considerations
- Provides transferable knowledge
- Appropriate model selection
Technical Requirements
- Executable without modification (except API keys)
- Uses non-deprecated API patterns
- Uses valid model names (claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-haiku-4-5, claude-opus-4-6)
- Uses non-dated model aliases (never dated IDs like claude-sonnet-4-6-20250514)
- Model name defined as constant at top of notebook
- Includes dependency specifications
- Assigned to primary category
- Has relevant tags
Content Philosophy: Action + Understanding
Cookbooks are primarily action-oriented but strategically incorporate understanding and informed by Diataxis framework.
Core Principles:
- Practical focus: Show users how to accomplish specific tasks with working code
- Problem-first framing: Lead with the problem being solved and value delivered, not the machinery
- Builder's perspective: Written from the user's point of view, solving real problems
- Agency-building: Help users understand why approaches work, not just how
- Transferable knowledge: Teach patterns and principles that apply beyond the specific example
- Critical thinking: Encourage users to question outputs, recognize limitations, make informed choices
- Learning contracts: State learning objectives upfront, then map back to them in conclusions
What Makes a Good Cookbook
A good cookbook doesn't just help users solve today's problem, it also helps them understand the underlying principles behind the solutions, encouraging them to recognize when and how to adapt approaches. Users will be able to make more informed decisions about AI system design, develop judgement about model outputs, and build skills that transfer to future AI systems.
What Cookbooks Are NOT
Cookbooks are not pure tutorials: We assume users have basic technical skills and API familiarity. We clearly state prerequisites in our cookbooks, and direct users to the Academy to learn more on topics. They are not comprehensive explanations: We don't teach transformer architecture or probability theory. We need to understand that our users are following our cookbooks to solve problems they are facing today. They are busy, in the midst of learning or building, and want to be able to use what they learn to solve their immediate needs. Cookbooks are not reference docs: We don't exhaustively document every parameter, we link to appropriate resources in our documentation as needed. Cookbooks are not simple tips and tricks: We don't teach "hacks" that only work for the current model generation. We don't over-promise and under-deliver. Cookbooks are not production-ready code: They showcase use cases and capabilities, not production patterns. Excessive error handling is not required.
Style Guidelines
Voice & Tone
- Educational and agency-building
- Professional but approachable
- Respectful of user intelligence and time
- Either second person ("you") or first person plural ("we") - be consistent within a notebook
Writing Quality
- Clear, concise explanations
- Active voice preferred
- Short paragraphs (3-5 sentences)
- Avoid jargon without definition
- Use headers to break up sections
Code Presentation
- Always explain before showing: Every code block should be preceded by explanatory text
- Explain after running: Include what we learned after code blocks execute
- Comments explain why, not what: Use meaningful variable names
- Use constants: Define MODEL as a constant at the top
- Good habits: Use
dotenv.load_dotenv()instead ofos.environ
Output Handling
Remove extraneous output with %%capture:
- pip install logs (always suppress these)
- Verbose debug statements
- Lengthy stack traces (unless demonstrating error handling)
Show relevant output:
- API responses that demonstrate functionality
- Examples of successful execution
Structural Requirements
See style_guide.md for detailed templates and examples
1. Introduction (Required)
Must include:
- Problem hook (1-2 sentences): What problem are we solving?
- Why it matters (1-2 sentences): Why is this important?
- Learning objectives (2-4 bullet points): "By the end of this cookbook, you'll be able to..."
- Use action verbs (Build, Implement, Deploy, etc.)
- Be specific about capabilities
- Include context/constraints
- Optional: Broader applications (1 sentence)
❌ Avoid: Leading with machinery ("We will build a research agent...") ✅ Do: Lead with problem/value ("Your team spends hours triaging CI failures...")
2. Prerequisites & Setup (Required)
Must include:
- Required Knowledge: Technical skills needed
- Required Tools: Python version, API keys with links
- Recommended: Optional background that helps
- Setup: Step-by-step with explanations
- Use
%%capturefor pip installs - Use
dotenv.load_dotenv()notos.environ - Define
MODELconstant at top
- Use
3. Main Content (Required)
Organized by logical steps or phases, each with:
- Clear section headers
- Explanatory text before code blocks (what we're about to do)
- Code examples
- Explanatory text after code blocks (what we learned)
- Expected outputs (where relevant)
- Optional: Understanding callouts (why it works, when to use, limitations)
4. Conclusion (Recommended)
Must include:
- Recap: Map back to lea
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →Auditing non-instructional code files
- →Evaluating business logic performance
- →General notebook linting unrelated to educational quality
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Relies on human interpretation for qualitative scoring
- →Limited by the scope of the provided style_guide.md
- →Automated scans cannot detect all logical security flaws
How it compares
Provides a pedagogical audit focusing on learning objectives and style compliance rather than just code execution.
Compared to similar skills
cookbook-audit side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cookbook-audit (this skill) | 5 | 5mo | Review | Intermediate |
| deepwiki-rs | 25 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
| python-code-style | 9 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
| pr-review | 6 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by anthropics
View all by anthropics →You might also like
deepwiki-rs
sopaco
AI-powered Rust documentation generation engine for comprehensive codebase analysis, C4 architecture diagrams, and automated technical documentation. Use when Claude needs to analyze source code, understand software architecture, generate technical specs, or create professional documentation from any programming language.
python-code-style
wshobson
Python code style, linting, formatting, naming conventions, and documentation standards. Use when writing new code, reviewing style, configuring linters, writing docstrings, or establishing project standards.
pr-review
pytorch
Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, test coverage, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".
django-verification
affaan-m
Verification loop for Django projects: migrations, linting, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness checks before release or PR.
lint-and-validate
davila7
Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.
code-style-guide
OpenHands
Project coding standards and style guidelines. Always follow these conventions when writing or reviewing code.