CO

convex-security-check

Provides a security auditing checklist for Convex developers.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/convex-security-check && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/9155" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/convex-security-check && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/convex-security-check

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Quick security audit checklist covering authentication, function exposure, argument validation, row-level access control, and environment variable handling
155 charsno explicit “when” trigger
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • →Verify authentication providers
  • →Audit function exposure
  • →Validate function arguments
  • →Check row-level access control

How it works

Provides a structured checklist to verify authentication, argument validation, and row-level security in Convex functions.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Convex function code
You get back
Security audit checklist status

When to use convex-security-check

  • →Auditing authentication logic
  • →Reviewing row-level security
  • →Validating environment variable handling

About this skill

Convex security check

A ten minute pass over convex/ that catches the mistakes that ship most often. The one rule: every exported query, mutation, and action is a public endpoint anyone can call with any arguments, so each one must check identity and ownership or be intentionally anonymous.

Run each grep, read what it surfaces, fix or file. This skill finds problems; it does not map the whole system. For that, hand off to convex-security-audit.

When to reach for this

  • Before merging a pull request that touches convex/
  • After adding or renaming public functions
  • The user says "quick security check", "sanity check the backend", or "anything obviously wrong here"
  • Before a dev to prod push, when there is no time for a full audit

Checklist

Run the commands from the project root. Every grep excludes _generated.

1. Public vs internal

Anything only called by other Convex functions, the scheduler, crons, or webhooks should be internalQuery, internalMutation, or internalAction.

rg -n "export const \w+ = (query|mutation|action)\(" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "\bapi\.\w+\.\w+" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'

The second grep finds api.* used inside the backend. Server code scheduling or running a public function is almost always a sign that function should be internal.

  • Every public function has a client that needs to call it
  • No api.* inside ctx.scheduler.*, ctx.run*, or crons.*
  • Admin only operations (role changes, credit grants, deletions across users) are internal

2. Auth

rg -l "= (query|mutation|action)\(" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**' \
  | xargs rg -L "getUserIdentity|getCurrentUser|authedQuery|authedMutation"

Files listed contain public functions and no auth call at all. Open each one. A public post list is fine anonymous. Anything that returns or writes user data is not.

  • Every public function checks identity or is documented as intentionally anonymous
  • Auth helpers throw or return early when identity is missing
  • Roles come from the users table, never from client arguments

3. Validation

rg -nU "(query|mutation|action)\(\{\s*handler" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "v\.any\(\)" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'

The first grep finds functions whose definition starts with handler, meaning no args. The second finds v.any(), which turns off validation for that field.

  • Every function has args and returns validators
  • No v.any() on arguments that reach the database or an external API
  • Return validators list fields explicitly so passwordHash, stripeCustomerId, and internal flags cannot leak

4. Ownership and IDs

v.id("tasks") proves the string is a valid ID for that table. It does not prove the caller owns the document.

rg -n "ctx\.db\.(get|patch|delete|replace)\(args\." convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "userId: v\.(id|string)\(" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'

For each hit in the first grep, find the ownership comparison between the read and the write. For the second, a public function that accepts the caller's own userId as an argument is trusting the client to say who it is.

  • Every get, patch, delete, replace by a client supplied ID is followed by an ownership or membership check
  • Caller identity is derived from ctx.auth, never accepted as an argument
  • Lists use withIndex on the owner field, not a full scan plus filter

5. Secrets

rg -n -i "(sk_live|sk_test|whsec_|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|-----BEGIN|api[_-]?key\s*[:=]\s*['\"][A-Za-z0-9])" convex src --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "process\.env\." src

Anything in src/ that reads process.env or import.meta.env ships to the browser. Only deployment URLs and public client IDs belong there.

  • No secret literals in convex/, src/, tests, or fixtures
  • Secrets read from process.env inside the action or HTTP action that uses them
  • Dev and prod deployments use different keys

6. HTTP and storage

rg -n "http\.route|httpAction\(" convex/http.ts
rg -n "storage\.(generateUploadUrl|getUrl)" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
  • Every http.ts route verifies its caller (webhook signature, bearer token, or getUserIdentity) before parsing the body
  • Routes call internal.*, not api.*
  • generateUploadUrl requires auth
  • getUrl is called on a storage ID read from a document the caller owns, never on a storage ID passed by the client

One fix, before and after

The most common finding: auth is checked, ownership is not.

Before:

export const updateTask = mutation({
  args: { taskId: v.id("tasks"), title: v.string() },
  returns: v.null(),
  handler: async (ctx, args) => {
    const identity = await ctx.auth.getUserIdentity();
    if (!identity) throw new ConvexError("Sign in required");
    // any signed in user can rename any task
    await ctx.db.patch(args.taskId, { title: args.title });
    return null;
  },
});

After:

import { mutation } from "./_generated/server";
import { v, ConvexError } from "convex/values";
import { getCurrentUser } from "./lib/auth";

export const updateTask = mutation({
  args: { taskId: v.id("tasks"), title: v.string() },
  returns: v.null(),
  handler: async (ctx, args) => {
    const user = await getCurrentUser(ctx); // throws when signed out
    const task = await ctx.db.get(args.taskId);
    // same error for missing and not owned, so IDs cannot be probed
    if (!task || task.userId !== user._id) {
      throw new ConvexError({ code: "NOT_FOUND", message: "Task not found" });
    }
    await ctx.db.patch(args.taskId, { title: args.title });
    return null;
  },
});

getCurrentUser looks the user up through a by_tokenIdentifier index using identity.tokenIdentifier and throws when there is no identity. Define it once in convex/lib/auth.ts and use it everywhere.

Common mistakes

MistakeWhy it breaksDo this instead
Checking auth in the React component onlyAnyone can call the function from the dashboard or a scriptCheck in the handler
v.id("users") argument for "the current user"Client can pass any user's IDDerive from ctx.auth.getUserIdentity()
Comparing ownership to identity.emailEmails can be reused or unverifiedCompare to user._id
internalMutation treated as safe on its ownThe public caller may pass unverified IDsCheck the call site too
Fixing one hit and moving onThe same pattern usually appears in siblingsFix all hits from the grep

Hand off to convex-security-audit

Stop and run the full audit when any of these are true:

  • More than two or three findings in steps 2 or 4; the pattern is systemic
  • The app has multi tenant data (orgs, teams, workspaces)
  • http.ts has webhook routes or routes that return user data
  • Files are uploaded and served
  • The user asks for a report, a launch review, or a post incident review

The audit maps auth per function, data access per table, HTTP exposure, storage, scheduler trust, rate limiting, and produces a written findings report. This check does not.

Docs

When not to use it

  • →Non-Convex applications

Prerequisites

Convex applicationAuthentication provider (Clerk, Auth0, etc.)

Limitations

  • →Does not replace complete security testing

How it compares

Offers a domain-specific security audit for Convex instead of generic security scanning.

Compared to similar skills

convex-security-check side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
convex-security-check (this skill)08moReviewIntermediate
supabase-enterprise-rbac12moReviewAdvanced
solidity-security154moNo flagsIntermediate
supabase-rls-policy-generator1110moNo flagsAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

supabase-enterprise-rbac

jeremylongshore

Configure Supabase enterprise SSO, role-based access control, and organization management. Use when implementing SSO integration, configuring role-based permissions, or setting up organization-level controls for Supabase. Trigger with phrases like "supabase SSO", "supabase RBAC", "supabase enterprise", "supabase roles", "supabase permissions", "supabase SAML".

10

solidity-security

wshobson

Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.

15115

supabase-rls-policy-generator

hopeoverture

This skill should be used when the user requests to generate, create, or add Row-Level Security (RLS) policies for Supabase databases in multi-tenant or role-based applications. It generates comprehensive RLS policies using auth.uid(), auth.jwt() claims, and role-based access patterns. Trigger terms include RLS, row level security, supabase security, generate policies, auth policies, multi-tenant security, role-based access, database security policies, supabase permissions, tenant isolation.

11109

backend-security-coder

sickn33

Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.

2446

sqlmap-database-penetration-testing

davila7

This skill should be used when the user asks to "automate SQL injection testing," "enumerate database structure," "extract database credentials using sqlmap," "dump tables and columns from a vulnerable database," or "perform automated database penetration testing." It provides comprehensive guidance for using SQLMap to detect and exploit SQL injection vulnerabilities.

449

agent-security-manager

ruvnet

Agent skill for security-manager - invoke with $agent-security-manager

337

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry