complexity
Identifies and manages cyclomatic complexity and code coupling in .NET projects.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/complexity && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/13003" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/complexity && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/complexity
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.Key capabilities
- →Use CA1502 for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methods
- →Use CA1505 for low maintainability index
- →Use CA1506 for excessive class coupling
- →Keep rule severity in the root .editorconfig
- →Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in CodeMetricsConfig.txt
- →Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in AGENTS.md
How it works
The skill uses built-in .NET maintainability analyzers to identify complex methods and coupled code, configuring thresholds in .editorconfig and CodeMetricsConfig.txt, and aligning with AGENTS.md.
Inputs & outputs
When to use complexity
- →Finding overly complex methods
- →Configuring cyclomatic complexity thresholds
- →Reducing code coupling
- →Improving maintainability metrics
About this skill
.NET Complexity Review
Trigger On
- the team wants to find overly complex methods
- cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI
- maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- formatting-only work
- generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - current analyzer settings
- current maintainability limits
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling.
- Use these rules deliberately:
CA1502for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methodsCA1505for low maintainability indexCA1506for excessive class couplingCA1501when inheritance depth is also part of the design problem
- Keep rule severity in the root
.editorconfig. - Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in
CodeMetricsConfig.txtadded asAdditionalFiles. - Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in
AGENTS.md.
Bootstrap When Missing
If complexity thresholds are not configured yet:
- Detect current state:
rg -n "CA1501|CA1502|CA1505|CA1506|CodeMetricsConfig" -g '.editorconfig' -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .rg --files -g 'CodeMetricsConfig.txt'
- Add severity entries for
CA1502,CA1505,CA1506, andCA1501in root.editorconfig. - Add checked-in
CodeMetricsConfig.txtand include it asAdditionalFilesin project props. - Keep maintainability limits aligned with
AGENTS.md. - Run
dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECTand returnstatus: configuredorstatus: improved. - If policy relies only on
AGENTS.mdlimits with no analyzer gate by design, returnstatus: not_applicable.
Deliver
- explicit complexity and maintainability policy
- checked-in metric thresholds
- CI commands that surface complex methods early
Validate
- method-complexity checks are enabled where the repo wants them
- thresholds are versioned in repo, not held in IDE memory
- complexity findings map to real refactoring decisions
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
- Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
- Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
- Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
- Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
- Update the plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
- If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
status: not_applicablewith explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
status:complete|clean|improved|configured|not_applicable|blockedplan: concise plan and current iteration stepactions_taken: concrete changes madevalidation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasonsverification: commands, checks, or review evidence summaryremaining: top unresolved items ornone
For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.
Load References
Example Requests
- "Which analyzer finds complex methods in .NET?"
- "Add a complexity gate for our C# code."
- "Configure cyclomatic complexity thresholds."
When not to use it
- →For formatting-only work
- →For generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change
Limitations
- →Requires a .NET SDK-based repository
- →Does not apply to formatting-only work
- →Does not apply to generic analyzer setup without complexity policy change
How it compares
This skill focuses specifically on configuring and applying .NET's built-in complexity and maintainability analyzers with explicit thresholds and policy, rather than general code analysis or formatting.
Compared to similar skills
complexity side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| complexity (this skill) | 0 | 3mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| dotnet-solid-principles | 0 | 5mo | No flags | Advanced |
| managing-global-usings | 0 | 6mo | No flags | Beginner |
| csharp | 0 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by managedcode
View all by managedcode →You might also like
dotnet-solid-principles
rudironsoni
>-
managing-global-usings
christian289
Centralize external namespace imports (BCL, FCL, NuGet) in a GlobalUsings.cs file per project, keeping individual files clean.
csharp
The1nk
|
performance-benchmark
dotnet
Generate and run ad hoc performance benchmarks to validate code changes. Use this when asked to benchmark, profile, or validate the performance impact of a code change in dotnet/runtime.
dotnet-dev
GitTools
Expert guidance for .NET development in this repository. Use this skill for building, testing, debugging, and understanding project structure, coding conventions, dependency injection patterns, and testing practices.
generator.equals
diegofrata
Guidance for using Generator.Equals — a C# source generator for auto-generating Equals, GetHashCode, operators, and Diff/Inequalities methods via attributes.