Runs CodeQL static analysis to identify security vulnerabilities. Automates data flow tracking and codebase scanning.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/codeql && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/7081" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/codeql && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/codeql

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Runs CodeQL static analysis for security vulnerability detection using interprocedural data flow and taint tracking. Applicable when finding vulnerabilities, running a security scan, performing a security audit, running CodeQL, building a CodeQL database, selecting query rulesets, creating data extension models, or processing CodeQL SARIF output. NOT for writing custom QL queries or CI/CD pipeline setup.
407 chars · catalog description✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Build CodeQL databases
  • Run security scans with taint tracking
  • Generate data extension models
  • Process SARIF output
  • Execute multi-language analysis suites

How it works

It builds a relational database from source code and runs query suites to identify security vulnerabilities via data flow analysis.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Source code repository
You get back
SARIF vulnerability report

When to use codeql

  • Find SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • Run security scan on repository
  • Perform security audit
  • Build CodeQL database

About this skill

CodeQL Analysis

Supported languages: Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, Swift.

Skill resources: Reference files and templates are located at {baseDir}/references/ and {baseDir}/workflows/.

Essential Principles

  1. Database quality is non-negotiable. A database that builds is not automatically good — a cached build extracts nothing while reporting success.

  2. Data extensions catch what CodeQL misses. Django, Spring, and Express projects still wrap database calls, request parsing, and shell execution in project-specific APIs that no shipped model covers.

  3. Explicit suite references prevent silent query dropping. Never pass pack names to codeql database analyze — each pack's defaultSuiteFile applies hidden filters that can produce zero results. Always generate a .qls.

  4. Zero findings needs investigation, not celebration. It can mean poor extraction, missing models, the wrong packs, or suite filtering. Run {baseDir}/scripts/check_db_quality.py after the build, confirm {baseDir}/scripts/verify_query_suite.py exited zero for the suite in use — the generation scripts run it, so invoke it by hand only for a reused or hand-edited suite — and say in the report that both passed.

  5. macOS Apple Silicon requires workarounds for compiled languages. Exit code 137 is an arm64e/arm64 mismatch, not a build failure. Try Homebrew arm64 tools or Rosetta before falling back to build-mode=none.

  6. Follow workflows step by step. Each phase gates the next; skipping quality assessment or data extensions leaves the gap invisible in the results.

Each Bash call is a fresh shell

Nothing carries across a Bash call: not variables, not arrays, not functions sourced from build_log.sh. Every block below that uses a value must re-establish it in the same block. The workflows point back here rather than repeating it; what they do state is the specific damage at that site, because each one fails differently and silently:

  • a lost function makes run_logged exit 127, which the build ladder reads as a failed method and walks down to --build-mode=none, never having invoked CodeQL
  • a lost array expands to nothing, so every --threat-model and --model-packs the user chose is dropped while the final report still lists them as used
  • a lost scalar under set -u aborts the block with unbound variable

Output Directory

All generated files (database, build logs, diagnostics, extensions, results) are stored in a single output directory.

  • If the user specifies an output directory in their prompt, use it as OUTPUT_DIR.
  • If not specified, default to ./static_analysis_codeql_1. If that already exists, increment to _2, _3, etc.

In both cases, always create the directory with mkdir -p before writing any files.

Set USER_SPECIFIED_DIR to the literal path from the user's prompt before running this, or leave it unset to auto-increment. Nothing else assigns it.

# Resolve output directory
USER_SPECIFIED_DIR="${USER_SPECIFIED_DIR:-}"   # substitute the user's path here, if any
if [ -n "$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR" ]; then
  OUTPUT_DIR="$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR"
else
  BASE="static_analysis_codeql"
  N=1
  while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do
    N=$((N + 1))
  done
  OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"
fi
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"

The output directory is resolved once at the start before any workflow executes. All workflows receive $OUTPUT_DIR and store their artifacts there:

$OUTPUT_DIR/
├── rulesets.txt                 # Selected query packs (logged after Step 3)
├── codeql.db/                   # CodeQL database (dir containing codeql-database.yml)
├── build.log                    # Build log
├── codeql-config.yml            # Exclusion config (interpreted languages)
├── diagnostics/                 # Diagnostic queries and CSVs
├── extensions/                  # Data extension YAMLs
├── raw/                         # Unfiltered analysis output
│   ├── results.sarif
│   └── run-all.qls | important-only.qls
└── results/                     # Final results (filtered for important-only, copied for run-all)
    └── results.sarif

Database Discovery

A CodeQL database is identified by the presence of a codeql-database.yml marker file inside its directory. When searching for existing databases, always collect all matches — there may be multiple databases from previous runs or for different languages.

Discovery command. find_databases.sh prints one database path per line, filtering out the marker files a failed build leaves behind. Build the array in the same block that selects from it — each Bash call is a fresh shell, so an array built here is empty by the next call, and the run concludes there is no database:

# Command substitution, not `done < <(...)`: a process substitution discards the script's
# exit status, so "codeql is not on this shell's PATH" (exit 2) would arrive as an empty
# list and route to "build a new database" with three good ones sitting on disk.
if ! DB_LIST=$("{baseDir}/scripts/find_databases.sh" "${OUTPUT_DIR:-.}" .); then
  echo "ERROR: database discovery failed — see the message above" >&2
  exit 1
fi

FOUND_DBS=()
while IFS= read -r db; do
  [ -n "$db" ] || continue
  FOUND_DBS+=("$db")
done <<<"$DB_LIST"

echo "Found ${#FOUND_DBS[@]} existing database(s)"

# The metadata the selection prompt needs, collected here rather than in a block of its
# own: FOUND_DBS is gone by the next Bash call, and a loop over an array that no longer
# exists prints nothing and reports success.
for db in "${FOUND_DBS[@]}"; do
  CODEQL_LANG=$(codeql resolve database --format=json -- "$db" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.languages[0]')
  CREATED=$(grep '^creationMetadata:' -A5 "$db/codeql-database.yml" 2>/dev/null | grep 'creationTime' | awk '{print $2}')
  echo "$db — language: $CODEQL_LANG, created: $CREATED"
done

Never assume a database is named codeql.db — discover it by its marker file.

When multiple databases are found: use AskUserQuestion to let the user select which database to use, or to build a new one, from the language and creation time printed above. AskUserQuestion takes at most four options, so with more databases than that, offer the three most recent plus "Build a new database" and list the rest in the prompt text. Skip AskUserQuestion if the user explicitly stated which database to use or to build a new one in their prompt.

Quick Start

For the common case ("scan this codebase for vulnerabilities"):

# Verify CodeQL is installed. Stop here if it is not — every later command fails with
# a less informative error, and the run wastes a build cycle before saying why.
if ! command -v codeql >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "ERROR: codeql not found on PATH. Install it with one of:" >&2
  echo "  gh extension install github/gh-codeql   # then: gh codeql install-stub" >&2
  echo "  brew install --cask codeql" >&2
  echo "  https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases  (codeql-bundle)" >&2
  exit 1
fi

# jq parses `codeql resolve database --format=json` in the very next step. Without it
# CODEQL_LANG comes back empty and the run continues against the wrong language.
if ! command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "ERROR: jq not found on PATH (brew install jq / apt install jq)" >&2
  exit 1
fi

# uv runs both guard scripts and both suite generators. Check it here rather than at
# suite generation, which is after the build — otherwise a machine without uv spends
# the whole build before failing.
if ! command -v uv >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "ERROR: uv not found on PATH (https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/)" >&2
  exit 1
fi

codeql --version

Then resolve OUTPUT_DIR using the block in Output Directory above — it honours a user-specified directory, which a bare auto-increment does not.

Then execute the full pipeline: build database → create data extensions → run analysis using the workflows below.

Rationalizations to Reject

These shortcuts lead to missed findings. Do not accept them:

  • "security-extended is enough" - It is the baseline. Always check if Trail of Bits packs and Community Packs are available for the language. They catch categories security-extended misses entirely.
  • "security-and-quality is the broadest suite" - security-and-quality excludes all experimental/ query paths. For run-all mode, import both security-and-quality and security-experimental. The delta is 1–52 queries depending on the language.
  • "The database built, so it's good" - A database that builds does not mean it extracted well. Always run quality assessment and check file counts against expected source files.
  • "Data extensions aren't needed for standard frameworks" - Even Django/Spring apps have custom wrappers that CodeQL does not model. Skipping extensions means missing vulnerabilities.
  • "build-mode=none is fine for compiled languages" - It produces severely incomplete analysis. Only use as an absolute last resort. On macOS, try the arm64 toolchain workaround or Rosetta first.
  • "The build fails on macOS, just use build-mode=none" - Exit code 137 is caused by arm64e/arm64 mismatch, not a fundamental build failure. See macos-arm64e-workaround.md.
  • "No findings means the code is secure" - Run check_db_quality.py and verify_query_suite.py and report that they passed. Without them, zero findings and a database that extracted nothing are the same output.
  • "I'll just run the default suite" / "I'll just pass the pack names directly" - Each pack's defaultSuiteFile applies hidden filters and can produce zero results. Always use an explicit suite reference.
  • "I'll put files in the current directory" - All generated files must go in $OUTPUT_DIR. Scattering files in the working directory makes cleanup impossible and risks overwriting

Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • For writing custom QL queries
  • For CI/CD pipeline setup
  • For simple pattern matching

Prerequisites

CodeQL CLI installedSource code with build capability

Limitations

  • Requires build capability for compiled languages
  • High resource usage

How it compares

It performs deep interprocedural data flow analysis instead of simple regex-based pattern matching.

Compared to similar skills

codeql side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
codeql (this skill)12moReviewAdvanced
code-coverage04moReviewIntermediate
lint-and-validate66moReviewBeginner
backend-security-coder244moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

More by trailofbits

View all by trailofbits

differential-review

trailofbits

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.

3115

code-maturity-assessor

trailofbits

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations.

416

modern-python

trailofbits

Configures Python projects with modern tooling (uv, ruff, ty). Use when creating projects, writing standalone scripts, or migrating from pip/Poetry/mypy/black.

427

semgrep-rule-creator

trailofbits

Creates custom Semgrep rules for detecting security vulnerabilities, bug patterns, and code patterns. Use when writing Semgrep rules or building custom static analysis detections.

416

ton-vulnerability-scanner

trailofbits

Scans TON (The Open Network) smart contracts for 3 critical vulnerabilities including integer-as-boolean misuse, fake Jetton contracts, and forward TON without gas checks. Use when auditing FunC contracts.

410

cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

trailofbits

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchains for 9 consensus-critical vulnerabilities including non-determinism, incorrect signers, ABCI panics, and rounding errors. Use when auditing Cosmos chains or CosmWasm contracts.

32

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry