CL

clojure-review

Checks Clojure code for compliance with Metabase and community style guides.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/clojure-review && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/126" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/clojure-review && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/clojure-review

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
216 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Beginner

Key capabilities

  • Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide
  • Flag style guide violations in Clojure code
  • Identify improper naming conventions in ClojureScript
  • Verify documentation for public Clojure variables
  • Review Clojure code for organization issues
  • Scan for common issues using a pattern matching table

How it works

This skill reviews Clojure and ClojureScript code changes against Metabase coding standards and a community style guide, flagging specific style violations and potential issues.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Clojure or ClojureScript code changes, pull requests, or diffs
You get back
Comments on style violations or potential issues in the code

When to use clojure-review

  • Reviewing Clojure PRs
  • Checking ClojureScript style compliance
  • Validating public function documentation
  • Ensuring correct function naming

About this skill

Clojure Code Review Skill

@./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md

Review guidelines

What to flag:

  • Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
  • If CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide
  • Flag all style guide violations

What NOT to post:

  • Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
  • Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
  • Only post comments about style violations or potential issues

Example bad code review comments to avoid:

This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work!

Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.

The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here

Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.

Special cases:

  • Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter)

Quick review checklist

Use this to scan through changes efficiently:

Naming

  • Descriptive names (no tbl, zs')
  • Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value
  • kebab-case for all variables and functions
  • Side-effect functions end with !
  • No namespace-alias repetition in function names

Documentation

  • Public vars in src or enterprise/backend/src have useful docstrings
  • Docstrings use Markdown conventions
  • References use [[other-var]] not backticks
  • TODO comments include author and date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description

Docstring content — check every new or rewritten docstring against the anti-pattern table in the style guide above. Read the diff's docstrings on their own, separately from the code: prose is where review attention slides off, and a long docstring reads as diligence rather than as the liability it usually is.

Code Organization

  • Everything ^:private unless used elsewhere
  • No declare when avoidable (public functions near end)
  • Functions under 20 lines when possible
  • No blank, non-comment lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in let/cond)
  • Lines ≤ 120 characters

Tests

  • Separate deftest forms for distinct test cases
  • Pure tests marked ^:parallel
  • Test names end in -test or -test-<number>

Modules

  • Correct module patterns (OSS: metabase.<module>.*, EE: metabase-enterprise.<module>.*)
  • API endpoints in <module>.api namespaces
  • Public API in <module>.core with Potemkin
  • No cheating module linters with :clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]

REST API

  • Response schemas present (:- <schema>)
  • Query params use kebab-case, bodies use snake_case
  • Routes use singular nouns (e.g., /api/dashboard/:id)
  • GET has no side effects (except analytics)
  • Malli schemas detailed and complete
  • All new endpoints have tests

MBQL

  • No raw MBQL manipulation outside lib, lib-be, or query-processor modules
  • Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL

Database

  • Model and table names are singular nouns
  • Uses t2/select-one-fn instead of selecting full rows for one column
  • Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions

Drivers

  • New multimethods documented in docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md
  • Passes driver argument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names)
  • Minimal logic in read-column-thunk

Miscellaneous

  • Example data is bird-themed when possible
  • Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not #_:clj-kondo/ignore keyword form)

Pattern matching table

Quick scan for common issues:

PatternIssue
calculate-age, get-userPure functions should be nouns: age, user
update-db, save-modelMissing ! for side effects: update-db!, save-model!
snake_case_varShould use kebab-case
Public var without docstringAdd docstring explaining purpose
;; TODO fix thisMissing author/date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description
(defn foo ...) in namespace used elsewhereShould be (defn ^:private foo ...)
Function > 20 linesConsider breaking up into smaller functions
/api/dashboards/:idUse singular: /api/dashboard/:id
Query params with snake_caseUse kebab-case for query params
New API endpoint without testsAdd tests for the endpoint

Feedback format examples

For style violations:

This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consider user instead of get-user.

For missing documentation:

This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs.

For docstrings documenting code they don't own:

This describes how lib decides binning strategies internally. Nothing here fails when that changes, so it will go stale silently — drop it and let available-binning-strategies answer for its own behavior.

For docstring content that belongs in the body:

This paragraph explains why the branches are ordered this way, which is what someone editing the cond needs — but a caller can't act on it. Move it to an inline comment above the cond.

For organization issues:

This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked ^:private.

For API conventions:

Query parameters should use kebab-case. Change user_id to user-id.

When not to use it

  • When the changes are trivial or already follow style guidelines
  • When confirming that something 'looks good' or was done correctly
  • When the issue is a missing parenthesis, as linters catch these

Limitations

  • It does not post comments for trivial changes or adherence to guidelines
  • It does not post comments for missing parentheses
  • It only posts comments about style violations or potential issues

How it compares

This skill automates the identification of specific Clojure/ClojureScript style and quality issues, unlike a manual review that might miss subtle violations or require extensive memorization of guidelines.

Compared to similar skills

clojure-review side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
clojure-review (this skill)146moReviewBeginner
python-testing-patterns772moReviewIntermediate
dependency-upgrade265moReviewIntermediate
test-cases577moNo flagsBeginner

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry