chro-advisor
Provides consulting-style guidance on HR strategy, including hiring, team structure, and organizational culture.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/chro-advisor && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2211" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/chro-advisor && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/chro-advisor
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
People leadership for scaling companies. Hiring strategy, compensation design, org structure, culture, and retention. Use when building hiring plans, designing comp frameworks, restructuring teams, managing performance, building culture, or when user mentions CHRO, HR, people strategy, talent, headcount, compensation, org design, retention, or performance management.Key capabilities
- →Model headcount plans
- →Benchmark compensation frameworks
- →Design organizational structures
- →Analyze retention and attrition
- →Develop performance management cycles
How it works
It applies HR frameworks to translate business objectives into actionable headcount, compensation, and organizational designs, validated by people metrics and data.
Inputs & outputs
When to use chro-advisor
- →Design a new compensation framework
- →Develop a hiring plan for a scaling team
- →Restructure team hierarchy
- →Create a company culture initiative
About this skill
CHRO Advisor
People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, and culture that scales.
Keywords
CHRO, chief people officer, CPO, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition
Quick Start
python scripts/hiring_plan_modeler.py # Build headcount plan with cost projections
python scripts/comp_benchmarker.py # Benchmark salaries and model total comp
Core Responsibilities
1. People Strategy & Headcount Planning
Translate business goals → org requirements → headcount plan → budget impact. Every hire needs a business case: what revenue or risk does this role address? See references/people_strategy.md for hiring at each growth stage.
2. Compensation Design
Market-anchored salary bands + equity strategy + total comp modeling. See references/comp_frameworks.md for band construction, equity dilution math, and raise/refresh processes.
3. Org Design
Right structure for the stage. Spans of control, when to add management layers, title inflation prevention. See references/org_design.md for founder→professional management transitions and reorg playbooks.
4. Retention & Performance
Retention starts at hire. Structured onboarding → 30/60/90 plans → regular 1:1s → career pathing → proactive comp reviews. See references/people_strategy.md for what actually moves the needle.
Performance Rating Distribution (calibrated):
| Rating | Expected % | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 5 – Exceptional | 5–10% | Fast-track, equity refresh |
| 4 – Exceeds | 20–25% | Merit increase, stretch role |
| 3 – Meets | 55–65% | Market adjust, develop |
| 2 – Needs improvement | 8–12% | PIP, 60-day plan |
| 1 – Underperforming | 2–5% | Exit or role change |
5. Culture & Engagement
Culture is behavior, not values on a wall. Measure eNPS quarterly. Act on results within 30 days or don't ask.
Key Questions a CHRO Asks
- "Which roles are blocking revenue if unfilled for 30+ days?"
- "What's our regrettable attrition rate? Who left that we wish hadn't?"
- "Are managers our retention asset or our attrition cause?"
- "Can a new hire explain their career path in 12 months?"
- "Where are we paying below P50? Who's a flight risk because of it?"
- "What's the cost of this hire vs. the cost of not hiring?"
People Metrics
| Category | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Talent | Time to fill (IC roles) | < 45 days |
| Talent | Offer acceptance rate | > 85% |
| Talent | 90-day voluntary turnover | < 5% |
| Retention | Regrettable attrition (annual) | < 10% |
| Retention | eNPS score | > 30 |
| Performance | Manager effectiveness score | > 3.8/5 |
| Comp | % employees within band | > 90% |
| Comp | Compa-ratio (avg) | 0.95–1.05 |
| Org | Span of control (ICs) | 6–10 |
| Org | Span of control (managers) | 4–7 |
Red Flags
- Attrition spikes and exit interviews all name the same manager
- Comp bands haven't been refreshed in 18+ months
- No career ladder → top performers leave after 18 months
- Hiring without a written business case or job scorecard
- Performance reviews happen once a year with no mid-year check-in
- Equity refreshes only for executives, not high performers
- Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles
- eNPS below 0 — something is structurally broken
- More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people
Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | CHRO works with... | To... |
|---|---|---|
| Headcount plan | CFO | Model cost, get budget approval |
| Hiring plan | COO | Align timing with operational capacity |
| Engineering hiring | CTO | Define scorecards, level expectations |
| Revenue team growth | CRO | Quota coverage, ramp time modeling |
| Board reporting | CEO | People KPIs, attrition risk, culture health |
| Comp equity grants | CFO + Board | Dilution modeling, pool refresh |
Detailed References
references/people_strategy.md— hiring by stage, retention programs, performance management, remote/hybridreferences/comp_frameworks.md— salary bands, equity, total comp modeling, raise/refresh processreferences/org_design.md— spans of control, reorgs, title frameworks, career ladders, founder→pro mgmt
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- Key person with no equity refresh approaching cliff → retention risk, act now
- Hiring plan exists but no comp bands → you'll overpay or lose candidates
- Team growing past 30 people with no manager layer → org strain incoming
- No performance review cycle in place → underperformers hide, top performers leave
- Regrettable attrition > 10% → exit interview every departure, find the pattern
Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
|---|---|
| "Build a hiring plan" | Headcount plan with roles, timing, cost, and ramp model |
| "Set up comp bands" | Compensation framework with bands, equity, benchmarks |
| "Design our org" | Org chart proposal with spans, layers, and transition plan |
| "We're losing people" | Retention analysis with risk scores and intervention plan |
| "People board section" | Headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, risks |
Reasoning Technique: Empathy + Data
Start with the human impact, then validate with metrics. Every people decision must pass both tests: is it fair to the person AND supported by the data?
Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
Context Integration
- Always read
company-context.mdbefore responding (if it exists) - During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- Invocation: You can request input from other roles:
[INVOKE:role|question]
When not to use it
- →Individual performance coaching
- →Legal advice on employment contracts
Limitations
- →Requires company-specific context for accurate modeling
- →Decisions must be reviewed by human leadership
How it compares
It uses data-driven modeling and standardized HR frameworks to design people strategies, rather than relying on subjective management intuition.
Compared to similar skills
chro-advisor side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| chro-advisor (this skill) | 6 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| planning-with-files | 233 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
| trello | 41 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| pmbok-project-management | 38 | 9mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by alirezarezvani
View all by alirezarezvani →You might also like
planning-with-files
davila7
Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.
trello
openclaw
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
pmbok-project-management
jgtolentino
Comprehensive PMP/PMBOK project management methodologies and best practices. Use this skill when users need guidance on project management processes, templates, knowledge areas, process groups, tools, techniques, or certification preparation. Covers all 10 PMBOK Knowledge Areas and 5 Process Groups with practical templates, frameworks, and industry-standard approaches. Includes risk management, stakeholder engagement, schedule management, cost control, quality assurance, and resource planning.
clickup
civitai
Interact with ClickUp tasks and documents - get task details, view comments, create and manage tasks, create and edit docs. Use when working with ClickUp task/doc URLs or IDs.
ma-playbook
alirezarezvani
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
create-plan
antinomyhq
Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.