CA

candidate-evaluation

Assess GitHub candidates for engineering roles.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/candidate-evaluation && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/5260" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/candidate-evaluation && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/candidate-evaluation

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Evaluate GitHub contributors for MLOps/engineering roles. Use when analyzing candidates, researching GitHub profiles, or updating CONTRIBUTORS.md with hiring assessments.
170 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Beginner

Key capabilities

  • Retrieves GitHub contributor repository activity
  • Queries PR history for specific keywords
  • Analyzes tech stack (Docker, Kubernetes, vLLM)
  • Evaluates contribution quality via automated metrics
  • Generates formatted hiring scorecards

How it works

Executes targeted GitHub API requests to index developer activity and parses the results against a predefined competency rubric.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
GitHub username
You get back
Candidate score, strengths, weaknesses, and repository analysis

When to use candidate-evaluation

  • Evaluating job candidates
  • Researching developer GitHub activity
  • Updating contributor assessments

About this skill

Candidate Evaluation Skill

Evaluate GitHub contributors for engineering roles at Pollinations.

When to Use

  • User asks to evaluate a contributor or candidate
  • User wants to research GitHub profiles for hiring
  • User needs to update CONTRIBUTORS.md with candidate analysis
  • User mentions "hiring", "candidate", "MLOps", or "evaluate contributor"

Evaluation Criteria

Must-Have Skills (Weight: High)

  • Python: Primary language proficiency
  • DevOps: Docker, CI/CD, infrastructure
  • GPU/ML Deployment: Model serving, inference optimization

Nice-to-Have Skills (Weight: Medium)

  • Kubernetes, vLLM, TGI
  • Quantization (GGUF, ONNX)
  • CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions)

Work Style Indicators (Weight: Medium)

  • PR size preference (small, focused = good)
  • Response time to reviews
  • Documentation quality
  • Test coverage habits

Evaluation Process

  1. Gather Data via GitHub MCP or gh api:

    # Get user repos
    gh api users/{username}/repos --jq '.[].name'
    
    # Search PRs in pollinations
    gh api search/issues -X GET -f q='repo:pollinations/pollinations author:{username}'
    
    # Search code for MLOps keywords
    gh api search/code -X GET -f q='user:{username} docker OR kubernetes OR gpu OR vllm'
    
  2. Analyze Repositories for:

    • ML/AI projects (ComfyUI, HuggingFace, PyTorch)
    • DevOps tooling (Docker, CI/CD, scripts)
    • API/backend experience
    • Star counts and activity
  3. Check Pollinations Contributions:

    • Merged PRs (high signal)
    • Open issues/discussions
    • Project submissions
  4. Generate Profile with:

    • Fit score (1-10)
    • Strengths (bullet points)
    • Weaknesses (bullet points)
    • Key repositories table
    • Hiring recommendation

Output Format

Use ASCII box art for visual appeal:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  FIT: X.X/10  │  GitHub: username  │  Repos: N  │  Focus: Area             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

✅ STRENGTHS

  • Point 1
  • Point 2

❌ WEAKNESSES

  • Point 1
  • Point 2

📦 KEY REPOS

RepoTechWhat It Does

🎯 VERDICT: Recommendation

Skills Matrix Format

╔═══════════════════╦════════╦════════╦════════╦═══════════════╗
║     CANDIDATE     ║ Python ║ GPU/ML ║ Docker ║   FIT SCORE   ║
╠═══════════════════╬════════╬════════╬════════╬═══════════════╣
║ username          ║ █████  ║ ███    ║ ████   ║     X.X/10    ║
╚═══════════════════╩════════╩════════╩════════╩═══════════════╝

Legend: █ = Skill Level (1-5)

Reference Files

  • AGENTS.md - Project guidelines and contributor attribution

Example Queries

  • "Evaluate @username for MLOps role"
  • "Research GitHub profile for {username}"
  • "Add {username} to CONTRIBUTORS.md"
  • "Compare candidates X and Y"

When not to use it

  • Evaluating private GitHub organizations without API access
  • High-volume automated mass hiring

Prerequisites

GitHub API tokenAccess to Pollinations organization

Limitations

  • Limited to public GitHub data
  • Cannot infer true architectural competence from code only
  • Sensitive to repository tagging patterns

How it compares

Automates the manual inspection process of GitHub profiles for hiring criteria instead of subjective browsing.

Compared to similar skills

candidate-evaluation side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
candidate-evaluation (this skill)17moReviewBeginner
literature-review5592moReviewAdvanced
openalex-database487moReviewIntermediate
scientific-critical-thinking187moReviewAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

literature-review

K-Dense-AI

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

5591,298

openalex-database

davila7

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

48202

scientific-critical-thinking

davila7

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

1888

biorxiv-database

lifangda

Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.

780

physics-validator

omriwen

Validate optical physics parameters including Fresnel numbers, diffraction regimes, and resolution limits. This skill should be used when configuring Telescope, Microscope, or Camera instruments to ensure physically realistic parameters.

664

fda-database

davila7

Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.

539

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry