ats-review
Analyzes resumes against job requirements to improve ATS compatibility and success rates.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/ats-review && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/12035" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/ats-review && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/ats-review
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Analyze resume against job description for ATS optimization and keyword gapsKey capabilities
- →Extract hard and soft requirements from job descriptions
- →Identify keywords (technical terms, jargon, industry terminology)
- →Score resume based on keyword match and experience alignment
- →Generate a report with keyword analysis and gap analysis
- →Suggest quick wins for resume improvement
How it works
This skill extracts requirements and keywords from a job description, then analyzes a resume against these criteria to generate a score and report. The report includes keyword analysis, gap analysis, and quick wins.
Inputs & outputs
When to use ats-review
- →Optimizing resume for a specific job
- →Improving ATS search ranking
- →Gap analysis for career transitions
About this skill
ATS Review Skill
Score a resume against a job description. Identify keyword gaps, suggest improvements, and estimate ATS pass likelihood.
When to Use
- Before submitting an application
- When response rates are low
- To understand why applications aren't getting traction
Process
1. Extract Job Requirements
From the job description, identify:
Hard Requirements (must-have):
- Required years of experience
- Required technologies/tools
- Required certifications/degrees
- Deal-breakers if missing
Soft Requirements (nice-to-have):
- Preferred skills
- Bonus qualifications
- Culture fit indicators
Keywords (exact matches matter):
- Technical terms (languages, frameworks, tools)
- Role-specific jargon
- Industry terminology
2. Analyze Resume
Score the resume on:
| Category | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Keyword Match | 30% | Exact keyword presence from job description |
| Experience Alignment | 25% | Years + relevance of experience |
| Skills Coverage | 20% | Hard requirements coverage |
| Achievement Evidence | 15% | Quantified results, not just duties |
| Format Compatibility | 10% | ATS-parseable format |
3. Generate Report
## ATS Score: [X/100]
### Keyword Analysis
**Present**: [keywords found in resume]
**Missing**: [critical keywords not in resume]
**Partial**: [related but not exact matches]
### Gap Analysis
1. [Most critical gap and how to address it]
2. [Second gap]
3. [Third gap]
### Quick Wins
- [Easy change that would improve score]
- [Another easy change]
### Recommendation
[STRONG MATCH / MODERATE MATCH / WEAK MATCH / NOT RECOMMENDED]
[Brief explanation of recommendation]
Scoring Guidelines
- 90-100: Excellent match, high likelihood of passing ATS
- 75-89: Good match, likely to pass with minor tweaks
- 60-74: Moderate match, needs keyword optimization
- 40-59: Weak match, significant gaps to address
- Below 40: Not recommended, fundamental mismatch
Important Notes
- ATS systems vary widely; this is a heuristic, not a guarantee
- Keyword stuffing backfires if a human reviews it
- Focus on honest representation of actual skills
- Some gaps can be addressed in cover letter instead
Example Output
## ATS Score: 72/100
### Keyword Analysis
**Present**: Python, machine learning, data analysis, SQL, AWS
**Missing**: Kubernetes, CI/CD, Airflow
**Partial**: "distributed systems" (resume says "parallel computing")
### Gap Analysis
1. **Kubernetes** - Listed as required. If you have any container orchestration experience (Docker Swarm, ECS), mention it and add "familiar with Kubernetes concepts"
2. **CI/CD** - Do you use GitHub Actions, Jenkins, etc.? Add this explicitly
3. **Airflow** - If you've used any workflow orchestration, mention it
### Quick Wins
- Add "CI/CD" to your skills section (you mention GitHub Actions in a bullet point)
- Change "parallel computing" to include "distributed systems"
### Recommendation
MODERATE MATCH
Strong technical foundation but missing some DevOps/MLOps keywords they're looking for. Worth applying if you can honestly add the CI/CD reference.
Anti-Patterns
- Don't recommend adding skills the candidate doesn't have
- Don't optimize so heavily the resume becomes unreadable
- Don't ignore the "why" - a 95 score on a miserable job is still miserable
- Don't treat ATS score as the only factor
When not to use it
- →When not optimizing a resume for a specific job description
- →When not needing to identify keyword gaps
- →When not interested in ATS pass likelihood
Limitations
- →ATS systems vary widely; this is a heuristic, not a guarantee
- →Does not recommend adding skills the candidate doesn't have
- →Does not treat ATS score as the only factor
How it compares
This workflow provides a structured, data-driven analysis of a resume against a specific job description to optimize for ATS, unlike a general resume review.
Compared to similar skills
ats-review side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ats-review (this skill) | 0 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| scientific-writing | 94 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| ml-paper-writing | 48 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
| content-research-writer | 15 | 10mo | No flags | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
scientific-writing
K-Dense-AI
Write scientific manuscripts. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), abstracts, for research papers and journal submissions.
ml-paper-writing
davila7
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
content-research-writer
ComposioHQ
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
research-grants
davila7
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.
nsfc-research-content-writer
huangwb8
为 NSFC 正文"(二)研究内容"写作/重构,并同步编排"特色与创新"和"三年年度研究计划",输出可直接落到 LaTeX 模板的三个 extraTex 文件。适用于用户要写/改"研究内容、研究目标、关键科学问题、技术路线、创新点、三年计划/里程碑"等场景。
clinical-reports
davila7
Write comprehensive clinical reports including case reports (CARE guidelines), diagnostic reports (radiology/pathology/lab), clinical trial reports (ICH-E3, SAE, CSR), and patient documentation (SOAP, H&P, discharge summaries). Full support with templates, regulatory compliance (HIPAA, FDA, ICH-GCP), and validation tools.