ark-research
Searches for and clones technical documentation and repositories for local analysis within a research workspace.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/ark-research && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/5106" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/ark-research && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/ark-research
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Research technical solutions by searching the web, examining GitHub repos, and gathering evidence. Use when exploring implementation options or evaluating technologies.Key capabilities
- →Search and summarize GitHub repository codebases
- →Execute Git clone for local exploration
- →Organize research artifacts in a local directory
- →Compare architectural patterns based on evidence
How it works
Uses a hybrid flow of web searching for documentation and local bash execution to clone and index GitHub repositories for deeper analysis.
Inputs & outputs
When to use ark-research
- →Evaluating third-party libraries
- →Comparing architectural patterns
- →Gathering documentation for new tools
About this skill
Ark Research
Research technical solutions and gather evidence before implementation.
Research Process
1. Web Search First
Always start with web search to find:
- Official documentation
- GitHub repositories
- Blog posts and tutorials
- Protocol specifications (PDFs, RFCs)
2. Examine GitHub Repositories
GitHub raw content is often blocked. Clone repos to examine them:
cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/owner/repo.git
cat /tmp/repo/README.md
Look for:
- README documentation
- Code examples
- Architecture patterns
- Dependencies and requirements
3. Handle Blocked Content
If a website cannot be loaded:
- Ask the user to paste the relevant content
- Request PDFs or specification documents
- Ask for screenshots if visual content is needed
Example prompt:
"I found a relevant resource at [URL] but cannot access it. Could you paste the key content or provide the PDF?"
4. Local Research Workspace
Store findings in ./scratch/research/ for review:
mkdir -p ./scratch/research
Save:
- Cloned repo summaries
- Code snippets
- Architecture diagrams
- Comparison notes
5. Evidence Requirements
Minimum 2-3 datapoints required before recommending a solution:
- GitHub repo with active maintenance
- Documentation or specification
- Real-world usage examples
- Community feedback (issues, discussions)
If insufficient evidence, ask for guidance:
"I found only one reference to this approach. Can you point me to additional resources or clarify the requirements?"
Output Format
Always back up findings with sources:
## Research: [Topic]
### Option 1: [Solution Name]
- **Source**: [URL or repo link]
- **Pros**: ...
- **Cons**: ...
- **Evidence**: [What confirms this works]
### Option 2: [Solution Name]
...
### Recommendation
Based on [N] sources, I recommend [Option] because...
### Sources
- [Title](URL)
- [Repo](GitHub URL) - cloned and examined
- [Spec](URL) - user provided
Example Usage
User: "Research options for terminal recording in an MCP server"
- Web search: "terminal recording library node typescript"
- Find GitHub repos → clone to /tmp and examine
- Find asciinema, VHS, xterm.js
- Compare approaches in ./scratch/research/terminal-recording.md
- Present options with 2-3 sources each
When not to use it
- →Analyzing private proprietary repositories
- →When official documentation is sufficient
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Cannot access private GitHub repositories
- →Depends on availability of public documentation
How it compares
It mandates the creation of a local research workspace rather than just delivering a summary or answer.
Compared to similar skills
ark-research side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ark-research (this skill) | 1 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
| literature-review | 559 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| openalex-database | 48 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
| market-research-reports | 38 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by mckinsey
View all by mckinsey →You might also like
literature-review
K-Dense-AI
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
openalex-database
davila7
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.
market-research-reports
davila7
Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Features professional LaTeX formatting, extensive visual generation with scientific-schematics and generate-image, deep integration with research-lookup for data gathering, and multi-framework strategic analysis including Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, and BCG Matrix.
scientific-brainstorming
davila7
Research ideation partner. Generate hypotheses, explore interdisciplinary connections, challenge assumptions, develop methodologies, identify research gaps, for creative scientific problem-solving.
exa-search
benjaminjackson
Search the web for content matching a query with AI-powered semantic search. Use for finding relevant web pages, research papers, news articles, code repositories, or any web content by meaning rather than just keywords.
scientific-critical-thinking
davila7
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.