AN

analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk

Calculates potential disk usage before performing schema changes in CockroachDB to prevent outages.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/15007" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Estimates storage requirements for CockroachDB online schema change backfills using SHOW RANGES WITH DETAILS, KEYS, INDEXES. Use before CREATE INDEX, ADD COLUMN with INDEX/UNIQUE, ALTER PRIMARY KEY, CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW, CREATE TABLE AS, REFRESH, or SET LOCALITY on tables with large per-index footprints, to avoid mid-backfill disk exhaustion.
348 charsno explicit “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Estimate storage requirements for online schema change backfills
  • Check free space per store using DB Console or Prometheus
  • Estimate affected table/index size using SHOW RANGES
  • Compare free space against conservative free-space targets
  • Identify paused schema change jobs due to InsufficientSpaceError

How it works

This skill estimates storage needs by checking available disk space and calculating table/index sizes using SQL queries, then compares these values against recommended safety margins.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
A CockroachDB operation like CREATE INDEX or ALTER PRIMARY KEY on a table with large per-index footprints
You get back
An estimate of required storage headroom and a safety assessment for the operation

When to use analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk

  • Estimating schema change storage
  • Monitoring index backfill impact
  • Preventing disk space exhaustion
  • Planning large table alterations
  • Analyzing range distribution

About this skill

Analyzing Schema Change Storage Risk

Estimates the storage headroom needed to safely run online schema changes. Mirrors the official guidance: some operations may temporarily require up to 3× the size of the affected table or index while the schema change is in flight.

For ongoing range-distribution monitoring, see analyzing-range-distribution.

When to Use This Skill

Run a quick estimate before issuing any of these operations on a table whose indexes are large (multiple GB per index, or many ranges per index):

  • CREATE INDEX
  • ADD COLUMN with INDEX or UNIQUE
  • ALTER PRIMARY KEY
  • CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
  • CREATE TABLE AS
  • REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
  • ALTER TABLE ... SET LOCALITY (when the locality change rewrites data)

Tables whose indexes are small (kilobytes to a few megabytes) carry trivial storage risk; estimation is unnecessary.

Background

How much temporary space does a backfill actually need?

The honest answer depends on the operation:

  • CREATE INDEX / ADD COLUMN ... UNIQUE: needs roughly 1× the size of the new index — the indexed columns plus the primary key columns, written into a fresh index span. This is typically a small fraction of the table. Worst-case headroom is bounded by the size of that one index.
  • ALTER PRIMARY KEY: rewrites the primary index and any secondary indexes whose definitions depend on the old PK. Old data sticks around until GC, so peak on-disk usage during the change can approach the size of the table again.
  • All bulk-ingest backfills: extra MVCC versions and pre-compaction SSTs add overhead until Pebble compacts and GC runs.

The official docs round these up into a single conservative recommendation: plan for up to 3× the size of the affected table or index as free space. That figure is a safety bound, not a precise prediction. For most CREATE INDEX operations the real cost is much smaller; for ALTER PRIMARY KEY on a large table it is the right ballpark.

What happens if the cluster runs out of disk mid-backfill?

Backfills bulk-ingest data via AddSSTable, which checks the per-store remaining capacity before each ingestion. If the remaining fraction falls below kv.bulk_io_write.min_capacity_remaining_fraction (default 0.05, i.e. 5%), the ingest is rejected with InsufficientSpaceError. Both the legacy and declarative schema changers translate that error into a job pause request, so the schema change halts rather than wedging the cluster. To resume, free space (e.g. drop unused indexes, expand storage) and resume the paused job.

This is a reactive safety net, not a planning tool — by the time it fires, foreground writes on the affected store may already be unhealthy.

Estimating Capacity

Step 1 — Check free space per store

The minimum free space across stores is what bounds the schema change, not the total cluster free space (replicas are spread across nodes).

No production-safe SQL view exposes per-store capacity. Use the DB Console OverviewStorage page (sorts per-store usage), or scrape the per-node Prometheus endpoint and look at the smallest capacity_available:

curl -ks https://<node>:8080/_status/vars | grep -E '^capacity( |_used|_available)'

Step 2 — Estimate the affected table/index size

Use the docs-recommended form of SHOW RANGES:

SHOW RANGES FROM TABLE <table> WITH DETAILS, KEYS, INDEXES;

The output includes one row per range, with range_size_mb and index_name. Aggregate by index for the per-index totals that matter for capacity planning:

WITH r AS (SHOW RANGES FROM TABLE <table> WITH DETAILS, KEYS, INDEXES)
SELECT
  index_name,
  COUNT(*)                              AS range_count,
  ROUND(SUM(range_size_mb), 2)          AS index_size_mb,
  ROUND(SUM(range_size_mb) / 1024, 2)   AS index_size_gb
FROM r
GROUP BY index_name
ORDER BY index_size_mb DESC;

Step 3 — Compare against the operation

OperationConservative free-space target (per store)
CREATE INDEX / ADD COLUMN ... UNIQUEUp to 3× the size of the new index (its indexed + PK columns).
ALTER PRIMARY KEYUp to 3× the size of the table (sum of the relevant indexes from step 2).
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW / CREATE TABLE ASUp to 3× the expected size of the materialized result.

The new index does not exist yet, so estimate it from a comparable existing index (e.g. one on similarly typed columns) or from the source columns' contribution to the primary index.

If the smallest free-space figure from step 1 is well above the target, the operation is safe to run. If it is close, free space first (drop unused indexes, expand storage) before issuing the DDL.

Operational Notes

  • SHOW RANGES ... WITH DETAILS is expensive. It computes span statistics on demand. Always target a specific table, never run it cluster-wide, and prefer maintenance windows on tables with thousands of ranges.
  • Watch the job, not just disk. If a backfill pauses with InsufficientSpaceError, free disk on the affected store and resume the paused schema change job. Check with:
    WITH j AS (SHOW JOBS)
    SELECT job_id, status, error
    FROM j
    WHERE job_type = 'SCHEMA CHANGE' AND status = 'paused';
    
  • Drop unused indexes first. Often the cheapest way to free headroom before a large backfill is to drop indexes that crdb_internal.index_usage_statistics shows are unused (this is one of the 12 production-safe crdb_internal views, per the docs).
  • Statistics lag. range_size_mb is approximate and can lag actual disk usage; treat estimates as conservative ballparks, not exact figures.

References

Related Skills

Additional references

When not to use it

  • For tables whose indexes are small (kilobytes to a few megabytes)
  • For ongoing range-distribution monitoring

Prerequisites

SQL access

Limitations

  • This skill estimates storage requirements for CockroachDB online schema change backfills
  • This skill requires SQL access
  • SHOW RANGES WITH DETAILS computes span_stats on demand and is expensive on tables with many ranges

How it compares

This skill provides a structured, query-based method to proactively estimate storage risk for schema changes, preventing mid-backfill disk exhaustion, unlike reactive error handling.

Compared to similar skills

analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
analyzing-schema-change-storage-risk (this skill)01moReviewIntermediate
drizzle-orm322moNo flagsIntermediate
database-design66moReviewIntermediate
database-schema-designer66moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry