alterlab-hypogenic
Runs automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets with HypoGeniC, combining literature insights with data-driven testing. Use when systematically exploring hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (for example deception detection or content analysis). For manual hypo
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/alterlab-hypogenic && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/16034" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/alterlab-hypogenic && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/alterlab-hypogenic
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Runs automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets with HypoGeniC, combining literature insights with data-driven testing. Use when systematically exploring hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (for example deception detection or content analysis). For manual hypothesis formulation use alterlab-hypothesis-gen; for open-ended creative ideation use alterlab-scientific-brainstorm. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.About this skill
Hypogenic
Overview
Hypogenic provides automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models to accelerate scientific discovery. The framework supports three approaches: HypoGeniC (data-driven hypothesis generation), HypoRefine (synergistic literature and data integration), and Union methods (mechanistic combination of literature and data-driven hypotheses).
Quick Start
Get started with Hypogenic in minutes:
# Install the package
uv pip install hypogenic
# Clone example datasets
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# Run basic hypothesis generation
hypogenic_generation --config ./data/your_task/config.yaml --method hypogenic --num_hypotheses 20
# Run inference on generated hypotheses
hypogenic_inference --config ./data/your_task/config.yaml --hypotheses output/hypotheses.json
Flag names below are illustrative. The upstream docs expose exact arguments only via
hypogenic_generation --help/hypogenic_inference --help— confirm there before scripting.
Or use the example scripts (the library ships runnable scripts under examples/; there is no one-line fluent task.generate_hypotheses(...) API — see "Python API Usage" below for the real classes):
python ./examples/generation.py --help # HypoGeniC data-driven generation
python ./examples/inference.py --help # single-hypothesis inference
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when working on:
- Generating scientific hypotheses from observational datasets
- Testing multiple competing hypotheses systematically
- Combining literature insights with empirical patterns
- Accelerating research discovery through automated hypothesis ideation
- Domains requiring hypothesis-driven analysis: deception detection, AI-generated content identification, mental health indicators, predictive modeling, or other empirical research
Key Features
Automated Hypothesis Generation
- Generate 10-20+ testable hypotheses from data in minutes
- Iterative refinement based on validation performance
- Support for both API-based (OpenAI, Anthropic) and local LLMs
Literature Integration
- Extract insights from research papers via PDF processing
- Combine theoretical foundations with empirical patterns
- Systematic literature-to-hypothesis pipeline with GROBID
Performance Optimization
- Redis caching reduces API costs for repeated experiments
- Parallel processing for large-scale hypothesis testing
- Adaptive refinement focuses on challenging examples
Flexible Configuration
- Template-based prompt engineering with variable injection
- Custom label extraction for domain-specific tasks
- Modular architecture for easy extension
Reported Results (from arXiv:2410.17309, Literature Meets Data)
- +8.97% over few-shot, +15.75% over literature-only, +3.37% over data-driven-only baselines
- Human accuracy improved +7.44% (deception detection) and +14.19% (AI-generated content detection)
- A redundancy checker prunes near-duplicate hypotheses to keep the final bank diverse
Core Capabilities
1. HypoGeniC: Data-Driven Hypothesis Generation
Generate hypotheses solely from observational data through iterative refinement.
Process:
- Initialize with a small data subset to generate candidate hypotheses
- Iteratively refine hypotheses based on performance
- Replace poorly-performing hypotheses with new ones from challenging examples
Best for: Exploratory research without existing literature, pattern discovery in novel datasets
2. HypoRefine: Literature and Data Integration
Synergistically combine existing literature with empirical data through an agentic framework.
Process:
- Extract insights from relevant research papers (typically 10 papers)
- Generate theory-grounded hypotheses from literature
- Generate data-driven hypotheses from observational patterns
- Refine both hypothesis banks through iterative improvement
Best for: Research with established theoretical foundations, validating or extending existing theories
3. Union Methods
Mechanistically combine literature-only hypotheses with framework outputs.
Variants:
- Literature ∪ HypoGeniC: Combines literature hypotheses with data-driven generation
- Literature ∪ HypoRefine: Combines literature hypotheses with integrated approach
Best for: Comprehensive hypothesis coverage, eliminating redundancy while maintaining diverse perspectives
Installation
Install via pip:
uv pip install hypogenic
Optional dependencies:
- Redis server (port 6832): Enables caching of LLM responses to significantly reduce API costs during iterative hypothesis generation
- s2orc-doc2json: Required for processing literature PDFs in HypoRefine workflows
- GROBID: Required for PDF preprocessing (see Literature Processing section)
Clone example datasets:
# For HypoGeniC examples
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# For HypoRefine/Union examples
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/Hypothesis-agent-datasets.git ./data
Dataset Format
Datasets must follow HuggingFace datasets format with specific naming conventions:
Required files:
<TASK>_train.json: Training data<TASK>_val.json: Validation data<TASK>_test.json: Test data
Required keys in JSON:
text_features_1throughtext_features_n: Lists of strings containing feature valueslabel: List of strings containing ground truth labels
Example (headline click prediction):
{
"headline_1": [
"What Up, Comet? You Just Got *PROBED*",
"Scientists Made a Breakthrough in Quantum Computing"
],
"headline_2": [
"Scientists Everywhere Were Holding Their Breath Today. Here's Why.",
"New Quantum Computer Achieves Milestone"
],
"label": [
"Headline 2 has more clicks than Headline 1",
"Headline 1 has more clicks than Headline 2"
]
}
Important notes:
- All lists must have the same length
- Label format must match your
extract_label()function output format - Feature keys can be customized to match your domain (e.g.,
review_text,post_content, etc.)
Configuration
Each task requires a config.yaml file specifying:
Required elements:
- Dataset paths (train/val/test)
- Prompt templates for:
- Observations generation
- Batched hypothesis generation
- Hypothesis inference
- Relevance checking
- Adaptive methods (for HypoRefine)
Template capabilities:
- Dataset placeholders for dynamic variable injection (e.g.,
${text_features_1},${num_hypotheses}) - Custom label extraction functions for domain-specific parsing
- Role-based prompt structure (system, user, assistant roles)
Configuration structure:
task_name: your_task_name
train_data_path: ./your_task_train.json
val_data_path: ./your_task_val.json
test_data_path: ./your_task_test.json
prompt_templates:
# Extra keys for reusable prompt components
observations: |
Feature 1: ${text_features_1}
Feature 2: ${text_features_2}
Observation: ${label}
# Required templates
batched_generation:
system: "Your system prompt here"
user: "Your user prompt with ${num_hypotheses} placeholder"
inference:
system: "Your inference system prompt"
user: "Your inference user prompt"
# Optional templates for advanced features
few_shot_baseline: {...}
is_relevant: {...}
adaptive_inference: {...}
adaptive_selection: {...}
Refer to references/config_template.yaml for a complete example configuration.
Literature Processing (HypoRefine/Union Methods)
To use literature-based hypothesis generation, you must preprocess PDF papers:
Step 1: Setup GROBID (first time only)
bash ./modules/setup_grobid.sh
Step 2: Add PDF files
Place research papers in literature/YOUR_TASK_NAME/raw/
Step 3: Process PDFs
# Start GROBID service
bash ./modules/run_grobid.sh
# Process PDFs for your task
cd examples
python pdf_preprocess.py --task_name YOUR_TASK_NAME
This converts PDFs to structured format for hypothesis extraction. Automated literature search will be supported in future releases.
CLI Usage
Hypothesis Generation
hypogenic_generation --help
Key parameters:
- Task configuration file path
- Model selection (API-based or local)
- Generation method (HypoGeniC, HypoRefine, or Union)
- Number of hypotheses to generate
- Output directory for hypothesis banks
Hypothesis Inference
hypogenic_inference --help
Key parameters:
- Task configuration file path
- Hypothesis bank file path
- Test dataset path
- Inference method (default or multi-hypothesis)
- Output file for results
Python API Usage
The library is not a one-call fluent API — generation runs as an explicit init/update
loop over the algorithm classes (DefaultGeneration, DefaultInference, DefaultUpdate,
DefaultReplace), and inference runs through the inference_register. Copy and adapt the
scripts under examples/; for HypoRefine/Union adapt examples/union_generation.py.
Full import list, the generation/inference loop, inference_type strategy options, and the
critical extract_label() parsing contract: see references/python_api.md.
Workflow Examples
Three end-to-end scenarios — data-driven (HypoGeniC, AI-content detection), literature-informed
(HypoRefine, deception in hotel reviews), and comprehensive coverage (Union, mental-stress
detection) — with dataset prep, generation, and inference commands for each: see
references/workflow_examples.md.
Performance Optimization
Caching: Enable Redis caching to reduce API costs and computation time for repeated LLM calls
Parallel Processing: Leverage multiple workers for large-scale hypothesis generation and testing
Adaptive Refinement: Use challenging examples to iteratively improve hypothesis quality
Troubleshooting
**Issu
Content truncated.